sábado, 30 de março de 2013
100+ Google Truques para professores
É o mundo do Google..
Agora, podemos usá-lo de maneira mais fácil, então por que não aproveitar o vasto mundo que o Google tem para oferecer ?
sexta-feira, 29 de março de 2013
Online etiquette references
1. Boehlefeld, S. P. (1996). Doing the right thing: Ethical cyberspace research. The Information Society, 12, 141-152.
2. Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung [Ethical dimensions of online research]. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1-30. Online available at: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/24 24/
2. Ess, C. (2007). Internet research ethics. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 487-502). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Eysenbach, G. and Till, J. (2001). Information in practice. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ (British Medical Journal) 2001; 323(10 November), 1103-1105. Available online: <http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cg i/reprint/323/7321/1103>
4. Olivero, N. & Lunt, P. (2004). When the ethic is functional to the method: The case of e-mail qualitative interviews. In Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub.
5. Peden, B. F., & Flashinski, D. P. (2004). Virtual Research Ethics: A Content Analysis of Surveys and Experiments Online. In E. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub. http://www.idea-group.com/down loads/excerpts/1591401526E.pdf
6. Reips, U.-D. (1999). Online research with children. In U.-D. Reips, B. Batinic, W. Bandilla, M. Bosnjak, L. Gräf, K. Moser, & A. Werner (Eds.), Current Internet science - trends, techniques, results. Zürich: Online Press. [WWW document]. Available URL: http://gor.de/gor99/tband99/pd fs/q_z/reips.pdf
2. Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung [Ethical dimensions of online research]. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1-30. Online available at: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/24
2. Ess, C. (2007). Internet research ethics. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 487-502). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Eysenbach, G. and Till, J. (2001). Information in practice. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ (British Medical Journal) 2001; 323(10 November), 1103-1105. Available online: <http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cg
4. Olivero, N. & Lunt, P. (2004). When the ethic is functional to the method: The case of e-mail qualitative interviews. In Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub.
5. Peden, B. F., & Flashinski, D. P. (2004). Virtual Research Ethics: A Content Analysis of Surveys and Experiments Online. In E. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Pub. http://www.idea-group.com/down
6. Reips, U.-D. (1999). Online research with children. In U.-D. Reips, B. Batinic, W. Bandilla, M. Bosnjak, L. Gräf, K. Moser, & A. Werner (Eds.), Current Internet science - trends, techniques, results. Zürich: Online Press. [WWW document]. Available URL: http://gor.de/gor99/tband99/pd
Apropriação do telemóvel como ferramenta de mediação em mobile learning : estudos de caso em contexto educativo
Ensinar e aprender na era pós-PC: oportunidades e desafios by Adelina Mour
Relatório Unesco 2013 - Mobile learning
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)